Landlords and real estate professionals are encouraged to fill in an industrial survey of the High Court Enforcement Officers Association (HCEOA).
The survey, supported by Propertymark and other stakeholders, is designed to collect information to improve the concept of when the actions of the Supreme Court can be a suitable route to consider and which services should be implemented in the future.
There may be complex reasons why lease agreements fail and judicial action may have to be considered.
But currently there is a lot of regional inconsistency with regard to the capacity and efficiency of provincial courts and their ability to tackle with home -related issues.
The survey is intended to collect information from a wide range of contact points and offer guidance for future involvement at government level to promote positive change.
Comments, Propertymark Head of policy and campaigns Timothy Douglas said: “Member of the Propertymark member quotes delays in every phase of the possession of the possession of the district court, which starts with the first claim to the final possession by a bailiff of the provincial court and is the product of many contributing factors.
To this end, enforcement times can vary drastically from region to region. We know that when using a High Court enforcement officer, the implementation of a possession order is remarkably faster. It is therefore of vital importance that the British government in this area examines the reform to improve access to the judge in the private rented sector. “
HCEOA VICE chairman Michael Jackson said: “The reality is that the system has been stretched and landlords simply cannot afford to wait for months. It is clear that this postcode lottery of delays in expansions of the provincial court is a real nightmare for landlords in some parts of the country.”
He added: “Supreme Court is not a magical wand, and it is not the right choice for every landlord at the moment, but it can certainly help those who have to do with the worst delays in deportations that cost unfair landlords thousands of pounds.”